Brandy’s ‘Cinderella,’ on Disney+, is a lesson for Hollywood

by -188 views

Simply earlier than “Cinderella” premiered in 1997, main shops printed their critics’ disenchanted critiques. “Cinderella’s glass slippers are far too large for Brandy to fill,” wrote the Chicago Tribune. “To place it bluntly, the lady can’t act.” Selection described Whitney Houston’s Fairy Godmother as “a daunting caricature, one sure to ship the youngsters scurrying into Mother’s lap.” And the New York Instances known as it “a cobbled-together ‘Cinderella’ for the second, not the ages.”

Greater than 20 years later, because the Rodgers and Hammerstein musical makes its streaming debut Friday on Disney+, it’s clear that “Cinderella” — which attracted an estimated 60 million viewers in its preliminary airing, bought 1 million dwelling leisure models in its first week and was named essentially the most worthwhile TV film of its time — was each for its second and for the ages. Actually, the creatives behind Hollywood’s present movie-musical growth might be taught a factor or two from its intelligent spin on a basic textual content.

Brandy Norwood stars within the multicultural fairytale in a primary for the centuries-old plot, with earlier live-action remedies led by Mary Pickford in 1914, Julie Andrews in 1957 and Lesley Ann Warren in 1965. Simply as “Carmen Jones” and “The Wiz” did with the opera “Carmen” and the film “The Wizard of Oz,” respectively, “Cinderella” takes a widely known (and often white) story and put actors of shade on the forefront, one thing just a few studio-released movie-musicals — similar to 2004’s “Bride and Prejudice,” 2014’s “Annie” and, arguably, 2019’s “Cats” — have tried since.

Of this admittedly restricted subject, “Cinderella” stays the very best instance of colorblind casting of a display screen musical to this point, and the film nonetheless affords a helpful template for potential successors: Not solely does the corporate, together with background actors, collectively mirror our world, however the principals are additionally fastidiously chosen to go well with their roles no matter look. It doesn’t matter that Cinderella’s stepsisters look nothing alike; Veanne Cox and Natalie Desselle Reid ship the very best broad humor of the film, enjoying off one another in addition to any seasoned comedic duo.

Past her groundbreaking standing as Disney’s first Black princess, Norwood’s underrated efficiency is quietly spellbinding in its personal proper, with a delicate but effervescent sweetness that captures the basic’s Inherently Good protagonist. Due to her nonchalant supply of the extra proactive traces in Robert Freedman’s new guide, she underscores this model’s repositioning of the heroine from a younger lady passively ready to be rescued to 1 who takes cost of her destiny. Plus, her chemistry with the good-looking prince, performed by Broadway actor Paolo Montalban, is downright magical.

Brandy Norwood became Disney's first Black princess in "Cinderella."

Brandy Norwood turned Disney’s first Black princess in “Cinderella.”


The pairing of Norwood, a relative newcomer to the movie-musical, with Montalban, a extra skilled hand, factors to a different lesson to be realized from “Cinderella”: Extra productions ought to take probabilities on recent faces as an alternative of signing the identical handful of Hollywood names — James Corden, Meryl Streep and Anna Kendrick, for instance — to one more lead function. As an alternative, “Cinderella” facilities on Norwood, with help from well-known actors with theater expertise: Whoopi Goldberg and Victor Garber because the king and queen, Jason Alexander because the palace valet and Bernadette Peters as Cinderella’s stepmother. This supporting forged anchors the manufacturing in theatrical musicality, as an alternative of pulling the viewer out of the narrative with well-known individuals who can’t sing (a la Pierce Brosnan of “Mamma Mia!” and Alec Baldwin of “Rock of Ages”).

“Cinderella,” due to allowances by the composer’s property, additionally options the form of flexibility with the unique textual content that no profitable revamp can do with out. As Shondaland’s oral historical past of the film notes, as an example, “The Prince Is Giving A Ball” was expanded — by Fred Ebb, no much less — to offer Alexander, by that time a three-time Emmy nominee for “Seinfeld,” a slapstick spectacle. “Falling in Love With Love,” pulled from the lesser-known Richard Rodgers-Lorenz Hart present “The Boys From Syracuse,” fills out Peters’ villainous matriarch whereas showcasing her comedic sensibilities and Tony-winning vocals. And naturally, celebrity Houston will get a hovering solo in “There’s Music In You” to shut out the present.

These songs — together with the hopeful opening quantity “The Sweetest Sounds,” reallocated from Rodgers and Hammerstein’s “No Strings” — have been added for the display screen, a typical follow of musical diversifications, however none really feel extraneous; the truth is, they’ve since develop into “Cinderella” canon. But the film continues to be lower than 90 minutes lengthy, due to its lean and environment friendly script: the cruelty of Peters’ stepmother and the magnificence of Houston’s fairy godmother are communicated with only a scattering of traces, leaving loads of time for Goldberg’s recurring wordless bit. Extra movie-musicals might stand to trim skippable songs and pointless dialogue to channel the high-wire momentum of the stage, somewhat than attempt to replicate it precisely.

The diverse cast of "Cinderella."

The varied forged of “Cinderella,” from left: Jason Alexander, Paolo Montalban, Brandy Norwood, Whitney Houston, Bernadette Peters, Natalie Desselle Reid and Veanne Cox.


In the end, by embracing its story, its forged, its style and its medium — however by no means taking itself too significantly — “Cinderella,” helmed by director Robert Iscove, unleashes its actual magic: its completely calibrated tone. At its core, the musical type requires a suspension of disbelief for the viewers to associate with the fantastical conceit of singing one’s emotions and dancing the identical routine with a crowd. These moments might be mishandled in realism-obsessed movie-musicals like 1985’s dance-centric “A Refrain Line,” with its footwork-free cinematography, and 2012’s “Les Misérables,” with its relentless closeups. Should you don’t like musical storytelling, you’re higher off watching one other “Cinderella” adaptation — like 1998’s “Ever After,” 2004’s “A Cinderella Story” or 2015’s “Cinderella” — within the first place.

This model is for individuals who do benefit from the theatricality of a movie-musical, the splendor of a fairytale and the escapism of a romance and unapologetically revels within the enjoyable of all of it. There’s the humor of Rob Marshall’s choreography, as stuffed with character and narrative drive as any alternate of dialogue; the make-believe of Randy Ser’s heightened manufacturing design; and the vivid attract of Ellen Mirojnick’s costumes. This intention is most evocative throughout “10 Minutes In the past,” when the digicam swirls nonstop round Cinderella and the Prince as they fall in love on the ballroom flooring. (Altogether, it makes up for the movie’s visible results, the one aspect that’s woefully of its second.)

Hollywood’s renewed love for the movie-musical — together with Sony’s tackle “Cinderella,” scheduled for launch in July — has the potential to pay inventive and monetary dividends for each the movie and theater industries. And as “Cinderella” proves, the shape thrives most on the assumption that has made its legacy such an extended one: that “inconceivable issues,” as Norwood and Houston sing, “are taking place every single day.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *