At instances, the propaganda marketing campaign zeroed in on Mr. Sudworth, a longtime BBC correspondent who gained a George Polk Award final yr for his reporting on the internment camps in Xinjiang. The International Correspondents’ Membership of China mentioned on Wednesday that Chinese language state media had posted movies of Mr. Sudworth on-line utilizing footage obtained from police cameras.
Final month, The International Occasions, a state-backed nationalist tabloid, revealed a extensively circulated article attacking Mr. Sudworth for his Xinjiang reporting and accusing him of being an “anti-China” journalist backed by “overseas forces,” together with america.
“Prior to now few years, the BBC and their China correspondent, John Sudworth, have been doing their finest to demonize China as a merciless nation with out human rights by distorting the state of affairs in Xinjiang,” mentioned the article. “However in the present day, their ‘loopy’ distortions have been uncovered — the reality is that they’re the clowns who violate human rights.”
Earlier than the current propaganda marketing campaign, Mr. Sudworth had been repeatedly issued shortened journalist visas of as little as one month for practically three years, a part of an ongoing effort by the Chinese language authorities to punish information organizations for protection it perceives to be overly essential. Most resident overseas journalists are sometimes granted one-year visas.
In September, two Australian journalists fled China following a five-day diplomatic standoff that started when Chinese language state safety officers paid them unannounced visits, prompting fears that they might be detained. Australian information retailers now now not have any correspondents on the bottom in China at a time of fast-deteriorating relations between the 2 nations.
The International Correspondents’ Membership of China, whose members embrace many journalists working there, voiced concerns on Wednesday concerning the “rising frequency of inaccurate claims by Chinese language state and state-controlled entities that overseas correspondents and their organizations are motivated by anti-China political forces to provide protection that runs counter to the Communist Celebration’s official line.”
“Alarmingly, Chinese language authorities have additionally proven a better willingness to threaten journalists with authorized measures, proceedings that might topic them to exit bans, barring them from leaving China,” the membership added.
Amy Chang Chien contributed reporting.